Myślalem, że to nie przeszlo bez echa, ale Wasze zachwyty pod <a href=“http://www.esports.pl/?id=post&post_id=1879291469”>niusem</a> Merta mnie z blędu wyprowadzily.

-
That&#039;s why we and over 500 others nominated Google for a Big Brother award in 2003. The nine points we raised in connection with this nomination necessarily focused on privacy issues:

1. Google&#039;s immortal cookie:
Google was the first search engine to use a cookie that expires in 2038. This was at a time when federal websites were prohibited from using persistent cookies altogether. Now it&#039;s years later, and immortal cookies are commonplace among search engines; Google set the standard because no one bothered to challenge them. This cookie places a unique ID number on your hard disk. Anytime you land on a Google page, you get a Google cookie if you don&#039;t already have one. If you have one, they read and record your unique ID number.

2. Google records everything they can:
For all searches they record the cookie ID, your Internet IP address, the time and date, your search terms, and your browser configuration. Increasingly, Google is customizing results based on your IP number. This is referred to in the industry as “IP delivery based on geolocation."

3. Google retains all data indefinitely:
Google has no data retention policies. There is evidence that they are able to easily access all the user information they collect and save.

4. Google won&#039;t say why they need this data:
Inquiries to Google about their privacy policies are ignored. When the New York Times (2002-11-28) asked Sergey Brin about whether Google ever gets subpoenaed for this information, he had no comment.

5. Google hires spooks:
Matt Cutts, a key Google engineer, used to work for the National Security Agency. Google wants to hire more people with security clearances, so that they can peddle their corporate assets to the spooks in Washington.

6. Google&#039;s toolbar is spyware:
With the advanced features enabled, Google&#039;s free toolbar for Explorer phones home with every page you surf, and yes, it reads your cookie too. Their privacy policy confesses this, but that&#039;s only because Alexa lost a class-action lawsuit when their toolbar did the same thing, and their privacy policy failed to explain this. Worse yet, Google&#039;s toolbar updates to new versions quietly, and without asking. This means that if you have the toolbar installed, Google essentially has complete access to your hard disk every time you connect to Google (which is many times a day). Most software vendors, and even Microsoft, ask if you&#039;d like an updated version. But not Google. Any software that updates automatically presents a massive security risk.

7. Google&#039;s cache copy is illegal:
Judging from Ninth Circuit precedent on the application of U.S. copyright laws to the Internet, Google&#039;s cache copy appears to be illegal. The only way a webmaster can avoid having his site cached on Google is to put a “noarchive” meta in the header of every page on his site. Surfers like the cache, but webmasters don&#039;t. Many webmasters have deleted questionable material from their sites, only to discover later that the problem pages live merrily on in Google&#039;s cache. The cache copy should be “opt-in” for webmasters, not “opt-out."

8. Google is not your friend:
By now Google enjoys a 75 percent monopoly for all external referrals to most websites. Webmasters cannot avoid seeking Google&#039;s approval these days, assuming they want to increase traffic to their site. If they try to take advantage of some of the known weaknesses in Google&#039;s semi-secret algorithms, they may find themselves penalized by Google, and their traffic disappears. There are no detailed, published standards issued by Google, and there is no appeal process for penalized sites. Google is completely unaccountable. Most of the time Google doesn&#039;t even answer email from webmasters.

9. Google is a privacy time bomb:
With 200 million searches per day, most from outside the U.S., Google amounts to a privacy disaster waiting to happen. Those newly-commissioned data-mining bureaucrats in Washington can only dream about the sort of slick efficiency that Google has already achieved.

-

n-joy google then.

źródlo <a href=“http://www.google-watch.org/bigbro.html”>google-watch.org</a>

__

alternatywa ?

__

bs, takim rozumowaniem bylibysmy zmuszeni uzywac tylko tego co sami bysmy tworzyli

__

Ojej... Jakbym o.Rydzyka czytal.

__

Alternatywa dla google ? Sam bym chcial zobaczyc cos dorastajacego do piet guglom

__

jakim?

__

yahoo!

__

takim, ze wszystko co dobre ma swoje korzenie w komunizmie i sluzy do szpiegowania, jakby linux byl popularniejszy od windowsa to tez by cos na niego znalezli

__

ad 1, 2, 3 - co z tego? Wyznaczli nowe standardy, a &quot;IP delivery based on geolocation&quot; jest po prostu genialne.
ad 4 - jak to po co? Zeby ich system lepiej dzialal... A nie, chwila, przeciez zbieraja dane dla Al-Kaidy : }
ad 5 - hahaha, a jakby pan Cutts byl Polakiem to jeszcze by sie pewnie okazalo, ze wspolpracowal z SB : }}
ad 6 - kazdy update to ryzyko pozaru plyty glownej, pamietajcie, wierni!
ad 7 - dyskusyjne, ale nawet jakby zrobili to opcjonalnie, to bylby to &#039;ukryty monopol&#039; z racji punktu 8 - a ze maja te 75% linkow? Coz, widac, dobrze sobie poradzili i chwala im za to. Zadnych pretensji dopoki dobrze swiadcza swoje uslugi.
ad 9 - siur.

W sumie Jaras najlepiej to podsumowal - ojciec prowadzacy atakuje internet : }}
Na tym google-watch powinni otworzyc sklep sprzedajacy moherowe podkladki.

__

So true.

__

&#039;wszystko co dobre ma swoje korzenie w komunizmie&#039;
pomysliles topic?

__

&#039;halo Dzorcz Busz?&#039;
to sie wykazales teraz.
btw. oddalbys np mi dane na temat tego, czego i kiedy szukales w guglu i na jakie strony wchodziles odkad z gugla korzystasz?

__

nie chcialo mi sie czytac... moze ktos to strescic w 3 zdaniach, o co tyle szumu? :A

__

A szukasz na google tajnych informacji? Co interesuje miliardera i jego spolke, ze masz stulejke?

Takie &quot;o czym&quot; sie szuka to by google moglo wykorzystac gdyby mialo spolke z Bravo i szpiegowalo Eminema czy nie szuka objawow ciazy i czy czasami kogos nie zapylil znowu. Tylko, ze taki eminem ma od tego swoich ludzi i swoich doradcow

Nie dalbym Ci moich danych czego szukam, bo mamy ze soba jakas stycznosc, jestesmy tej samej narodowosci, postujemy na tym samym forum i moglbys obrocic te informacje przeciwko mnie, ale co taki Cutts z nimi zrobi? Dupe sobie podetrze.

__

widzisz, ta dyskusja do niczego nie prowadzi; ja po przeczytaniu tego chwilke sie zastanowilem przy wpisywaniu nastepnego hasla do gugla; Ty podskoczyles z radosci - mala roznica, ale jednak.

__

Teraz wogole nie czaje o czym do mnie gadasz

A to &quot;ze masz&quot; odnosi sie ogolnie do ludzi, a raczej watpie, zebym trafil ze Stulejką w Twoją strone bo jestem jednym z nielicznych, ktorzy musieli sie meczyc z tą wadą

__

google jest ZLE. rejestruje dane o tobie, instaluje spyware jesli korzystasz z ich programiku, olewa polityke prywatnosci itd.

ale imo ja nie uzywam zadnych google toolbarow, ani innych tego typu progamikow, a z wyszukiwarki google nadal bede korzystal ^^

__

bo alternatywy, faktycznie, nie ma.
tyle ze chociaz warto sobie zdawac sprawe z pewnych rzeczy;
a co do gugla, to mnie ostatnio bawi np images.google - swietna rzecz

__